Search for: "Johns v. Carr"
Results 1 - 20
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Steve Vladeck (now at Texas), Michael Dorf (Cornell), and Marty Lederman (Georgetown). [* * *] I've been hearing some buzz about whether House Speaker John A. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Carr & G. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
., spy novels by John le Carré; ballets by George Balanchine; the Big Apple Circus; Shakespeare’s tragedies; Marvin Hamlisch and Edward Kleban’s “A Chorus Line;” or songs by Johnny Cash), 1 it serves as a creative outlet and can be a form of critical public commentary. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
., spy novels by John le Carré; ballets by George Balanchine; the Big Apple Circus; Shakespeare’s tragedies; Marvin Hamlisch and Edward Kleban’s “A Chorus Line;” or songs by Johnny Cash), 1 it serves as a creative outlet and can be a form of critical public commentary. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
John C. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Lady Justice Carr admitted the sentences were severe, but added “we have concluded that they were not manifestly excessive; nor did they amount to a disproportionate interference with their rights of freedom of expression and assembly. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:10 am
See Marrone v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 18 May 2023 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Carr v Carr. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am
. strictly limited; the court is not allowed to render a determination upon a thorough review of the relevant facts adduced by both parties, but rather is substantially more constrained in its review, examining only the plaintiff’s pleadings and affidavits” (Carr v Wegmans Food Mkts., Inc., 182 AD3d 667, 668 [3d Dept 2020]; see John R. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
And for those curious, the law professor amicus brief he mentioned was prepared by Professors Pam Karlan and John Jeffries, both at UVA at the time. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm
Smagin and CMB Monaco v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
Pix Credit hereI wanted to take this opportunity to circulate a discussion draft of an essay, entitled "Legal Semiotics, Globalization and Governance. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Carr.) [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
UPDATE: I missed the response on the docket (thanks to commenter John F. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Carr at the federal level and cases like the North Carolina Supreme Court decision below. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Commissioner John Edwards said he did not issue a warranted £10 million fine “as any money paid in fines is returned to government, and so the impact would have been minimal. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Carr an [read post]
