Search for: "Johns v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
JOHN DOE I, ET AL. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Department of Interior, et al. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Correction. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
AVENTURA TENNIS, LLC, INC., Appellee. 3rd District.Injury LawAdams, et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The court in Marbury held that it could not force James Madison, Secretary of State under President Thomas Jefferson, to deliver commissions signed by John Adams just before leaving office. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Al Qaida, et al. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
., ET AL., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
However, as Tompros et al. point out, in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing there was a good deal of false information spreading on various social media platforms, but using those very same platforms, the Boston Police Department ("BPD") quickly refuted and corrected the misinformation. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:07 am
Attorney General; JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; THOMAS G. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
Gibbons et al. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The Daily Express has corrected an article claiming that 900 migrants carried out sex attacks in Frankfurt on New Year’s Eve. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
[N]o argument about what he did or didn't facilitate, or about his special obligations as an attorney, makes his conduct morally equivalent to that of his nominal clients, Secretary Rumsfeld, et al., or comparable to the conduct of interrogators distant in time, rank and place. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
No breach – after investigation 07454-18 Belcher v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach – after investigation 07446-18 Heppell v Bella, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 08062-18 Gordon v Sunday Life, 3 Harassment (2018), No breach – after investigation 07925-18 Partlett v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 00154-19 Stirling… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
