Search for: "Johnson v. Apple Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
The plaintiffs got three free bites at the apple before the fourth crossed over the line; and it mattered that the copyright work at issue here–stickers for car consoles–is so clearly subject to minimal or no copyright protection that no one realistically should have thought the sticker design was copyrightable, despite the registrant’s earlier settlement with the second comer. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Apple retains the right to withdraw from the settlement in the event an excessive number of requests for exclusion are received.The Court will hold a hearing in this case (Johnson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
   On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas.JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE LEHRMANN, JUSTICE BOYD, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BROWN joined.JUSTICE BLACKLOCK did not participate in the decision.PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.This case involves an arbitration provision in short-term loan contracts. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 * GoPro and the Apple patent: buy on the rumour, sell on the fact? [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm by Amy Howe
Apple Inc.: Issues of patent infringement and obviousness Brewer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm by Hank Fasthoff
  The Fifth Circuit holds that a pending application satisfies § 411(a), see Apple Barrel Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was an appeal hearing before Johnson J in the case of Edwards v Okeke KA-2023-000070. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm by Anna Christensen
Today, opinions were handed down in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
It would be ironic indeed if Apple’s one-sided disclaimer of liabilities was what the judge relied on to deny Apple’s request to intervene in the suit. *** Judge: Nash Bargaining Is No Solution for Patent Damages In Uniloc v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation)   US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
JUSTICE BLACKLOCK did not participate in the decision.PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.This case involves an arbitration provision in short-term loan contracts. [read post]