Search for: "Johnson v. Arnold" Results 61 - 80 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
Sir Richard Arnold, Lord Justice of AppealFees:  Fees are charged for this event from £8 - £35. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Arnold v Britton & Ors, heard 26 January 2015. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A legal malpractice claim accrues when the alleged injury to the client occurs, such as when the trust agreement was funded, regardless of the client’s awareness of the malpractice (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 67 [Pt Dept 2015]; Pace v Raisman & Assoc. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
MICHAEL ARNOLD, JANET ARNOLD, STEVE SOUTH AS TRUSTEE AND ON BEHALF OF THE SOUTH LIVING TRUST, JOHN S. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Johnson was married to artist Dutterrer and when he passed away in 2007, he left all of his artwork to Johnson in his will. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Next it was Aparajita’s turn to come up with an incisive case review of Lupin Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 Panellists are Mr Justice Arnold, Chris Wadlow, Phillip Johnson and Birgit Clark. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 19 July 2022 Johnson J heard an application in the case of Hills v Fomukong Epse Tabe. [read post]