Search for: "Johnson v. Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dist."
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 6:09 pm
Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dist. and the opinion is here.DGVSHAW VALENZA LLP - http://shawvalenza.com [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 7:39 am
Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dist., 174 Cal.App.4th 729 (2009) [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 3:00 pm
Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dist. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 729, 734-735, which rejected similar claims:[U]nless Labor Code provisions are specifically made applicable to public employers, they only apply to employers in the private sector. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
Arvin-Edison Water Storage District (2009), the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that water storage districts are municipal corporations for purposes of Labor Code 220(b). [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 4:24 pm
Arvin–Edison Water Storage Dist., 174 Cal.App.4th 729 (2009) in its analysis, stating that “unless Labor Code provisions are specifically made applicable to public employers, they only apply to employers in the private sector. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 12:27 pm
Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dist. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 729, 736; Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:13 pm
Arvin-Edison Water Storage Dist.) [read post]