Search for: "Johnson v. Atkins" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
The Supreme Court held in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was an appeal hearing before Johnson J in the case of Edwards v Okeke KA-2023-000070. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack [2023] EWCA Civ 892. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
” IPSO 20214-23 Lunn v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach: sanction – publication of correction 20293-23 Mendes v Western Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20606-23 White v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last week. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
Wainwright, in 1986) nor the mentally disabled (Atkins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of LCG v OVD, QB-2022-000921. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Private Investigators: Chris Atkins, director of Starsuckers, went undercover to investigate private investigators for a new Dispatches on Channel 4pm (Monday, 8pm). [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
In a Nov. 1 letter, the senators called on the SEC not to take action on either draft rule and instead allow shareholders to continue filing proxy access resolutions based on the 2006 AFSCME v. [read post]