Search for: "Johnson v. C"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First and foremost, the Johnson Ministry was dedicated to re-access the Lugano Convention[23] which extended the Brussels regime to certain Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)/European Economic Area (EEA) in its own right.[24] Given the strong resentments Brexiteers showed against the CJEU during their campaign this move is not without a certain irony, as its case law is also crucial to the uniform interpretation of the Lugano Convention.[25] Whereas Switzerland,… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Johnson; (4) Jesus Land: A Memoir by Julia Scheeres; and (5) Red Hood by Elana K. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Johnson; (4) Jesus Land: A Memoir by Julia Scheeres; and (5) Red Hood by Elana K. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 412 (1989) (holding that a law based on the communicative or emotive impact of speech on its audience is content based and subject to "the most exacting scrutiny" (quoting Boos v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
§ 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of an official proceeding including congressional proceedings. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Vicki C. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
& C. 4th 251, 257 (2003), or that the TV program Born Innocent led some underage viewers to sexually attack a small child in copying a scene shown on the program, Olivia N. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
Miller (1939), Johnson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Eric Johnson: my confusion is often intrabrand: which variety does my son want? [read post]
