Search for: "Johnson v. Collins" Results 1 - 20 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:25 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Regular readers of this blog may remember my report on the case of Johnson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:16 am by Eileen McDermott
Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE) and Representatives Hank Johnson (D-GA), Doug Collins (R-GA), Martha Roby (R-AL) and Jerry Nadler (D-NY) yesterday introduced legislation to modernize the U.S. trademark system. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:45 pm
The Court of Appeal should shed some light in the case of Johnson v Old due before the Court of Appeal in March. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:17 pm
” It was worded as an impeachment resolution similar to the one brought against President Andrew Johnson. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
A Cato-centric list: Supreme Court’s past refusal to enforce plain language of Contracts Clause cries out for review, but in Minnesota life insurance dispute only Gorsuch is up for the task [Roger Pilon, related Cato podcast] In Collins v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Seth Collins, No. 117,743 (Sedgwick)State appeal (petition for review)Patrick H. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 10:36 am by Dan Taskalos
On April 18, 2019, Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), along with Representatives Doug Collins (R-GA), Hank Johnson (D-GA), and Steve Stivers (R-OH), released a bipartisan framework for 35 U.S.C. [read post]