Search for: "Johnson v. Department of Corrections" Results 21 - 40 of 448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Johnson, 2022 ONCA 534; 2023 SCC 24 (40330) Kasirer J.: “We are all of the view that the majority in the Court of Appeal was correct to conclude that party liability was properly left to the jury by the trial judge. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court is to decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to strike out the claim as an abuse of process. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that the Civil Service Reform Act barred such a suit brought by Jason Payne, a civilian employee of the Department of the Navy. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Vullo involves a lawsuit in which the NRA alleges that Maria Vullo, then the Superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, violated its First Amendment rights by threatening its business partners to try to encourage them to disassociate from the NRA. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has summarised the evidence given by Scobie and Johnson. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by Alexandra Walsh
For example, in the seminal case Goss v. [read post]