Search for: "Johnson v. Hale*" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2013, 11:51 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Johnson, Judge Caputo noted in Vaskas that "[o]nce the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:26 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 46671 (WD MI, Feb. 19, 2013), a Michigan federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of an inmate's claim that he was not allowed to attend church services while he was on parole to a Residential Sex Offender Program.In Johnson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Johnson & Johnson decision, that court had declined to adopt the Restatement (Third) of Torts. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm by Eric
Related posts: * Two Recent Social Media Defendants Avoid Personal Jurisdiction * Web Host Gets Easy 47 USC 230 Win in Catfight--Johnson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Kevin Johnson
Johnson,  Dean of the UC Davis School of Law and Mabie-Apallas Professor of Public Interest Law and Chicana/o Studies. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Rambo of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania addressed such a scenario under the Federal Rules of Discovery in her recent decision in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
  To briefly summarise the background to each appeal: Mr Johnson’s application was rejected on the basis that he had not shown himself to be “less able to fend for [himself] than an ordinary homeless person”. [read post]