Search for: "Johnson v. Hamilton" Results 41 - 60 of 282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2019, 6:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), including the requirement of a final decision. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, a decision from 1985 interpreting the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a Zimbabwean Chiefdom,… [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:07 am by Bilodeau Capalbo, LLC
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, that property owners must seek just compensation in state court before filing a takings claim under federal law. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), a 34-year old precedent that established a federal claim was not ripe until a state takings plaintiff exhausted its remedies under state law. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am by Barbara Lichman
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), in which the court found that the property owner had improperly sued a local planning commission in federal court under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am by Wally Zimolong
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985)  severely frustrated, if not all but foreclosed, a property owner’s right to bring a claim in federal court based on a regulatory taking. [read post]