Search for: "Johnson v. Hobbs"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 7:33 am
Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978) (Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments require that a sentencer in a capital case not be precluded from considering and giving effect to mitigating factors); Johnson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Johnson (1989) Frisby v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Johnson, 13-10288 (second relist). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Johnson, ___ N.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
The petition contends that the behavior was merely creepy, and not an attempt to obtain “property” by means of extortion under the Hobbs Act, as the Second Circuit thought. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
Hobbs[7] protected Muslim prisoners who objected to beard bans. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
Continuing on in the criminal vein: Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
E.g., Elliott v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Hobbs, 13-6827 (ditto); Warger v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Johnson, 13-10288, was denied outright while the Court appears to be holding runners-up Tolliver v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Hobbs (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-9647 Issue(s): Whether imposing a sentence of life without possibility of parole on an offender who was 14 at the time he committed capital murder constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Carter, No. 06-2412 In a prosecution for extortion under the Hobbs Act, defen [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
