Search for: "Johnson v. Interstate Power Co." Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Ambler Realty Co.; and (2) whether a regulatory restriction on the right to use one's property “must substantially advance a legitimate state interest” to satisfy the substantive requirement of due process, per Lingle, Nectow, and Euclid. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
   On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas.JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE GUZMAN, JUSTICE LEHRMANN, JUSTICE BOYD, JUSTICE DEVINE, and JUSTICE BROWN joined.JUSTICE BLACKLOCK did not participate in the decision.PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.This case involves an arbitration provision in short-term loan contracts. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
Kavanaugh wrote for a unanimous court, vacating board decisions in both Southern New England Telephone Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  The pair concerns whether the federal government has the power effectively to override a state governor’s decision not to allow a requested state-prisoner custody transfer under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under the facts and circumstances presented, it found no abuse of discretion in Supreme Courts determination to, effectively, adjust the equitable distribution award to reflect an excessive temporary maintenance award (see Johnson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
JUSTICE BLACKLOCK did not participate in the decision.PHIL JOHNSON, Justice.This case involves an arbitration provision in short-term loan contracts. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:39 am
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991), the Court held that an individual employee could be compelled to arbitrate age discrimination claims, but it appeared as if a union was prohibited under Alexander v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
The developer now urges the court to revisit its open-ended test for assessing regulatory takings under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]