Search for: "Johnson v. Roadway Express, Inc" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
The petitions of the week are below the jump: Johnson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
  The opinion goes on to explain that [a]ccording to the digital information on the photographic evidence he received, Operator Teagarden testified that the yellow light interval time was 3.65 seconds, which exceeds the 3.6 seconds required for a 35 mile an hour roadway. [read post]
Example: The mailman delivering mail to John and Sally’s mailbox trips and injures himself on an extension cord the Johnsons’ were using to power their Christmas lights. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
The first key finding of the trial court was that the general benefits created by the construction of a public roadway, even if generally beneficial to First Industrial, cannot be used to offset the damages to the residue of First Industrial’s property that was caused by the appropriation for that roadway.11Second, the trial court found that the damage to the residue of First Industrial’s property, based on the before and after approach of valuation, was $510,000.12… [read post]