Search for: "Johnson v. Supreme Court of the United States et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Other briefs that make this argument: Seattle School District No. 1; Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Part IV examines the three major state supreme court cases involving Bowie knives: In Georgia, Nunn v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
Croxall was taken off the air on 24 October 2022, after she was alleged to have shown bias when Boris Johnson pulled out of the Tory leadership contest. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
As mentioned above, on 11 October there was a statement in open court in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:18 pm
BPX Operating Co., et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 5:03 pm
James Breheny, et al. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
In Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In another, Logan Alters, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Kiser et al, 2019 WL 4017033, at *7 (S.D. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Zarda, No. 17-1623—the Supreme Court will consider whether the provision in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 making it unlawful for a covered employer to “discriminate against” an employee “because of such individual’s . . . sex” prohibits that employer from firing an employee because he’s a gay man. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
He cited subsequent cases that have construed Kiyemba narrowly: Aamer, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
