Search for: "Johnson v. The Advertiser Company" Results 21 - 40 of 316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
It also noted that offers for sale and advertising were ways of using a trade mark, and this is precisely what the trade mark owner has directed at EU consumers.I cannot immediately find a clear statement of the corresponding position in the UK, but do note the comments of Daniel Alexander QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge) in Abanka v Abanca [2017] EWHC 2428 (Ch) at paragraphs 102 to 104, with paragraph 103 distinguishing a non-UK business which “pushes” itself into the UK… [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
From February, advertisers will no longer be able to access a user’s gender or posts they have engaged with for targeted advertising. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
 A claim has been filed by technology and human rights activist Tanya O’Carroll in the High Court that accuses Facebook of “surveillance advertising” and calls on the company to stop the practice. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 7 November 2022, judgment was handed down in the case of AB v Chief Constable of British Transport Police [2022] EWHC 2749 (KB) by Mr Justice Johnson. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The broadcast alleged that a company in South East Asia that manufactured Dyson products abused and mistreated its employees. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
Some companies are using digital simulations of celebrities created with deepfake technology in advertisements, with or without the celebrities’ permission. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
The company will launch ‘My Ad Center’ which they claim will allow users to fine tune their advertising experience whilst retaining use of the product’s crucial features. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
IPSO  13241-21 Wood v Helensburgh Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 01139-22 Mehson v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02465-22 Gleeson v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 02466-22 Gleeson v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson The Spectacular Failure of Employee Social Media Privacy Laws Do Employers Own LinkedIn Groups Created By Employees? [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 11 July 2022 Johnson J heard the trial of preliminary issues in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 7:46 am by John Jascob
For the defendants’ alleged buying, marketing, advertising, promoting, and manipulating Dogecoin, the complaint asserts claims for RICO violations, common law fraud, negligence, false advertising, deceptive practices, products liability, and unjust enrichment (Johnson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Antitrust Trade Regulation Unfair Competition Misleading Statements False Advertising Design Defect and Failure-to-Warn Theories of Liability The FDA Did Not Create a Safe Harbor Statute of Limitations Tolling Agreement Consumer Law Drugs & Biotech Health Law California Law   Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., and Ethicon US, LLC (collectively, Ethicon) appeal an adverse judgment following a… [read post]