Search for: "Johnson v. US Dept. of Justice" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2008, 12:38 pm
Second, the New York State Court of Appeals has held to enforce the preemption of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 by the Graves Amendment (see Graham v Duckley, supra; Johnson v Kling, 854 NYS2d 648 [2 Dept 20081, reversed on other grounds, 10 NY3d 887 [2008]; Hernandez v Sanchez, 836 NYS2d 577 [1 Dept 2007]; Kuryla w Halabi, 835 NYS2d 230 [2 Dept 2007]; Jones v Bill, 825 NYS2d 508 [2 Dept 20063, reversed on… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:39 am by Mark Graber
    Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Tennessee v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016 [b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
The US Supreme Court has finished oral argument for the term, and about the only key criminal case still undecided is Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Title VI Legal Manual (Updated), Section X—Employment Coverage. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Those arguing that Lawrence described a fundamental right of sexual liberty tend to focus on the cases that Justice Kennedy cited as the basis of the Court's decision to overrule Bowers v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
Co. of Connecticut, 2003 WL 329054 (SDNY Feb. 13, 2003).The policyholder in Phillips did not appeal Justice Siwek’s corresponding order.Matter of Pottenburgh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
With respect to the trial at issue on this appeal, however, we "cannot say that his [mis]conduct . . . jeopardize[d] the fairness of the trial" (People v Johnson, 62 AD2d 555, 560, affd 47 NY2d 785, cert denied 444 US 857; see [*2]People v Alicea, 37 NY2d 601, 603; Paul, 78 AD3d at 1685). [read post]