Search for: "Johnson v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 3,887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2022, 7:18 am by Jennifer Davis
In 1964, she took up the second important case of her career, United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court held a further evidentiary hearing and  also contacted the United States Department of State for assistance. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Where a state breaches the ECHR, a Court set up by signatory members – the European Court of Human Rights (which has nothing to do with the European Union) – can order a state to pay an aggrieved citizen compensation. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm by Ediberto Roman
The promise of the nation’s first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court is a dramatic, historic change. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm by NARF
Johnson (Assimilative Crimes Act) The Shawnee Tribe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 2:57 pm by Russell Knight
” 740 ILCS 23/5(a)(2) “[T]ransgender individuals, fell squarely within section 5(a)” Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:04 pm by Steve Lubet
” “The critical issues that impact our day-to-day lives – such as voting and civil rights, reproductive freedom, climate justice, and consumer and workers’ rights – are being decided by a GOP-packed conservative supermajority on a United States Supreme Court, which is destroying its own legitimacy with partisan decisions that are upending decades of precedent and progress in this nation,” said Congressman Johnson, chair of the Judiciary… [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]