Search for: "Johnson v. Willett" Results 81 - 99 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2008, 9:08 am
Jun 6, 2008) (Phil Johnson) (eminent domain, condemnation)FKM PARTNERSHIP, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Brister, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett joined. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
May 30, 2008)(Justice Medina) (water rights) (13 page opinion in pdf)GUITAR HOLDING COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 1:15 pm
Justice Brister delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Hecht, Justice O'Neill, Justice Wainwright, and Justice Medina joined, and in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett joined as to parts I-V.Justice O'Neill delivered a concurring opinion.Justice Johnson wrote an opinion concurring and dissenting in part, which was joined by Chief Justice Jefferson and Justice GreenJustice Willett delivered an… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:36 am
The State brings this appeal… Justice Brister wrote for a five-Justice majority, joined by Justice O’Neill, Justice Medina, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 8:36 am
That 3-3 tie was broken by two Justices who were not on that original panel — Justice Johnson and Justice Willett. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 10:25 am
Justice Brister delivered the majority opinion, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Hecht, Justice Wainwright, Justice Green, Justice Medina, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett joined. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:41 pm by Veronica
The Constables That Owned Their Jobs: In Dallas v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 2:58 pm by Veronica
Justice Willett wrote the Court's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Hecht, Justice Green, and Justice Johnson) and held that the 68 foot yacht in question did not constitute a homestead. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:08 am by Veronica
Kenneth Johnson and Strunk & Assoc., revisits the Court’s 1994 decision in Light v. [read post]