Search for: "Johnston v. Marks" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
Finally, on the 1709 Blog, Andy Johnstone relates the content of this year's Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture, delivered by Judge Alex Kozinski. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm by Julie Lam
 Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave to appeal in In re Mark E Moon Estate, No. 142743 and would remand for sentencing in People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:17 am by Jani Ihalainen
While they could sell those goods without the marks on them, the Act prevents them from misleading purchasers and infringing on the marks while doing so. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
The 1709 Blog welcomes a new team member in Andy Johnstone, who will be known to many readers of this blog as one of its most frequent comment-posters on copyright-related matters. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:22 am
Ed. 2d 249 (2008) (Navy wins) Image: 'Beluga Whale'by Mark Johnston [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Washington State start-up NautiGirl received a trade mark cancellation notice from global lifestyle apparel house Nautica and its parent, VF Corp. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
[To make out an offence under s.92 Trade Marks Act 1994, the use of the trademark in question must be as an indication of trade origin. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 am
 Elsewhere, Andy Johnstone on the 1709 Blog discusses Save-the-Link Day (see below for further information). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the plaintiff was entitled to commence this legal malpractice action even though the underlying personal injury action was still pending, as the legal malpractice action accrued, at the latest, in November 2014 (see Johnston v Raskin, 193 AD2d 786, 787 [1993]). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm
This month marks 50 years since the landmark Supreme Court ruling that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools, Tinker v. [read post]