Search for: "Johnstone v. Kelly"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Terminated probationer denied a name-clearing hearingMatter of Johnston v Kelly, 35 A.D.3d 297, 828 N.Y.S.2d 10 Kevin Johnston, because he served as a probationary police officer, could be terminated from his position without a hearing or a statement of reasons, for any reason or no reason at all, provided the dismissal was not made in bad faith, was not for constitutionally impermissible reasons, or was not in violation of law. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
Lund v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
Lund v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:16 pm
Justice Marilyn Kelly would remand the case for a hearing pursuant to People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
(herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Post-Majority Child Support Ruling Reversed in Columbia: Johnston v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
New York courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of stigmatizing reasons for the discharge of a probationer to agency administrators did not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a "name-clearing hearing" was not required because of such intra-agency communications.** See also of Johnston v Kelly, 35 AD3d 297, where the court said “the sole purpose of a name-clearing hearing is to afford the employee an opportunity to prove that… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:21 pm
His presentation, "Family Violence and Children: Considering the Best Interests of Children" challenged the accepted view that family report writers, or custody evaluators as they are known in the US, get it right.These experts are engaged to make recommendations to the court about what is in the best interests of children.Mr Ralph, citing research, noted the following:assessments in family reports are mostly reliant on interviews and observationsare based on the untested information… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of Florida, January 21, 2010 Johnston v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:50 am
See Johnston v Kelly. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 696 N.E.2d 909, 923-24 (Mass. 1998); Kelly v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of Florida, January 21, 2010 Johnston v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
IPSO has published a number of other recent rulings: Resolution Statement 01487-19 O’Connor v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution statement 00209-19 A Woman v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2018), 3 Harassment (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution statement 07441-18 Ambrose v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07157-18 A man v Sunday World, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach… [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm
Mr Justice Vos was considering applications in the claims brought by Kelly Hoppen and Sienna Miller. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for… [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Brunsting, Stephen Brusell, Mark Bryan, David Bryant, Eulonda Bryant, Robert Bryant, Displaced Bubba, Byron Buckley, Carl Buhlman, Richard Burke, Erik Burrows, Randy Bush, Jay Buxton, Phyllis Byrd, Marie Cajuste, Joseph T Calhoon, Michelle Calhoun, Brian Callaghan, Mandy Camden, Heidi Campbell, Tom Campbell, Pedro Canahuati, Mike Canavan, Nicholas Cancelliere, Julia Cannon, Eric Cantor, Sam Cao, Linda Cappuccio, Britt Carlile, Tirzah Carpio, Josh Carrico, Jason Cash, Jim Cashion, Chris Casson,… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
