Search for: "Jonathan A. Field"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm
The traditional approach, of course, has been either to dismiss the impulse to Tarot systems as mere rubbish; the other approach has been to elevate the power of Tarot but to adjudge it the work of demonic forces (and thus, in some critiques, always corrupted even if powerfully valid). )Jonathan Jones recently provided a quite readable explanation (Dr Terror Deals the Death Card: HowTarpt was Turned into an Occult Obsession). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am
President & Fellows of Harvard College, and its companion case, in the labor and employment field. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 9:46 am
Congratulations, Jonathan! [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
I am grateful to Professor Jonathan Adler for agreeing to publish my response to his blog post on API v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 3:41 am
[Results in first comment].In re Family Defined Benefits, LLC, Serial Nos. 97248954 and 97248972 (November 27, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 2:15 am
Jonathan Sterling and Brendan Gooley are attorneys with Carlton Fields in Hartford, Connecticut. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
First, the functional view of a computer is problematic because it departs from established concepts in the field of computer science (e.g., the stored-program computer or the universal algorithm). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Doug Burgum suspended his campaign after failing to gain momentum with voters in a crowded primary field. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:00 am
ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl joins Preet to discuss his new book, Tired of Winning: Donald Trump and the End of the Grand Old Party. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am
Guest post by Jonathan Stroud and Sam Korte. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
In re Black Card LLC, 2023 USPQ2d 1376 (TTAB 2023) [precedentia] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 2:21 am
Notably, speakers selected for this event will be individually paired with an established academic discussant undertaking research in the same IP field. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:19 am
It could very well be that a project is not executed because an analysis of the field shows a landscape of thousands of patents. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
The appellant (Novozymes) had challenged the IPO’s order (of 15.11.2016) in which the claims were rejected primarily on the grounds that the claimed invention in Claims 1 and 2 pertaining to the phytase variant with improved thermostability is a known substance not patent eligible under S. 3(d) and claims 8 to 11 (the composition claims comprising the phytase variant) falls within the scope of S. 3(e) because the composition is a mere admixture of ingredients. 2) Legal tenets governing the… [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:24 am
Indeed, in June 2023, China’s antitrust authority, the State Administration for Market Regulation (‘SAMR’), published the draft Anti-Monopoly Guidelines in the Field of Standard Essential Patents (‘Guidelines’) – a document which aims to provide a comprehensive framework to regulate the SEPs landscape. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
In 2010, plaintiff consulted with attorney Jonathan Orkin about separating from Richards. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Jonathan Turley is J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:12 am
Jonathan Jones, Institute for Government: The European Convention on Human Rights: leave or stay? [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 8:24 am
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room is “Standing Without Injury,” by Jonathan H. [read post]
