Search for: "Jonathan Shaub, Benjamin Wittes"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jonathan David Shaub sits down with Benjamin Wittes to talk about Steve Bannon, executive privilege and misinformation. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 2:01 am
Jonathan David Shaub is an assistant professor of law at the University of Kentucky. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Deane School of Law joined Lawfare Editor-In-Chief Benjamin Wittes to discuss Meng Wanzhou’s recent deal with the Department of Justice: powered by Crowdcast A new episode of Lawfare No Bull featured testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee from top Pentagon officials about the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Ronan Bergman joined Benjamin Wittes to discuss the… [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 11:47 am
Jonathan Shaub explained the upcoming political battle over the amount of information the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack will be able to access. [read post]
29 May 2021, 6:41 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement is a considerable institutional defeat for Congress and that it advances a sweeping view of executive privilege. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:17 am
Jonathan Shaub examined whether a former president can invoke executive privilege in an impeachment trial. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Jonathan Shaub criticized the McGahn decision and argued that the court ignored the history of oversight and need for judicial review in its ruling. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Jonathan Shaub wrote that the D.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 2:01 am
To talk through it, Benjamin Wittes got together with Lawfare senior editor Scott Anderson who clerked on the DC Circuit, and Jonathan David Shaub, a Lawfare contributing editor and professor at the University of Kentucky J. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
To discuss it all, Benjamin Wittes spoke with Jonathan David Shaub, Lawfare contributor and incoming faculty at the University of Kentucky Law School, and Lawfare senior editors Margaret Taylor and Scott R. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 12:19 pm
To bring us up to speed with where we are, where we are after the big John Bolton bombshell over the weekend, and the coming fight over witnesses, Benjamin Wittes spoke with Margaret Taylor, Quinta Jurecic, and Jonathan David Shaub. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 10:38 am
Jonathan Shaub examined the process to subpoena witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:03 am
Jen Patja Howell shared a new episode of The Lawfare Podcast, which features David Priess, Molly Reynolds, Jonathan Shaub, Margaret Taylor and Benjamin Wittes imagining what the Senate impeachment trial will look like. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:58 pm
Benjamin Wittes gathered in the Jungle Studio with Margaret Taylor, Molly Reynolds, David Priess, and Jonathan Shaub (by phone) to imagine what that trial will look like. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
Jonathan Shaub proposed an understanding of executive privilege that, he argues, aligns more with historical precedent and constitutional principles than does much contemporary discussion of the subject. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:19 am
Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes shared the sixth episode of The Report, Lawfare’s podcast series telling the story contained in Robert Mueller’s 448-page report. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am
Jonathan Shaub delved into the Trump administration's new interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Scott Anderson and Benjamin Wittes discussed the reasoning behind their third annual Freedom of Information Act lawsuit of the internal climate survey at the FBI. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Scott Anderson and Benjamin Wittes discussed the reasoning behind their third annual Freedom of Information Act lawsuit of the internal climate survey at the FBI. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Jonathan Shaub walked readers through that assertion. [read post]
