Search for: "Jones v. Adams" Results 61 - 80 of 419
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am by Michael Douglas
On 14 September, Thawley J refused that application: Australian Information Commissioner v Facebook Inc (No 2) [2020] FCA 1307. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am by Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Journalist Sasha Issenberg will explore the story behind U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Adam Liptak of the New York Times writes that the decision in Trump v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Ireland The Irish Times had a piece “BBC must provide more information for Gerry Adams defamation case, judge rules”. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court’s Apple v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court released orders from Friday’s conference, adding one case to its merits docket for next term, Jones v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Ireland Former Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams wants the High Court to order the BBC to hand over more information he says he requires for a defamation case he is taking against the broadcaster. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:56 am by Kate Fort
Duncan asked 19, Dennis and Jones asked 11, Smith asked 7 and Costa asked 5. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Congratulations to Adam Speker of 5RB who was appointed as a QC in the recently published list. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]