Search for: "Jones v. Andrews"
Results 21 - 40
of 423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
.'"] The key passage, from Judge Andrew Carter's opinion Tuesday in Jones v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am
Judge James Ho concurred, and Judges Edith Jones, Jerry Smith, and Andrew Oldham concurred with the judgment only. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
In Jones Lange LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. v. 1441 L Associates, LLC, No. 22-046, JLL represented both parties to an agreement to lease property in northwest Washington, DC. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:22 pm
Tyler McBrien shared a motion submitted by Special Counsel Jack Smith for a protective order to limit the disclosure of discovery information in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Kohli v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:02 am
Brian Andrew Ade participated. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:25 am
On July 8, 2019, Simmons commenced the present action against Jones Law and Andrew P. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012). 2132. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
Jones, Nicholas Derdock, Andrew J. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm
Waring, First Black Supreme Court Advocate, and the case of Jones v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am
Andrew Selous (South Bedfordshire, Con): “The National Church Institutions have no current plans to do so”. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
Philip Jones’s new post complements those in L&RUK on the appointment of diocesan and suffragan bishops within the Church of England. [read post]
