Search for: "Jones v. Barnes" Results 121 - 140 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
Oral Arguments: Bond v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
One might think that such a concession is effectively no different than a guilty plea, and the decision whether to plead guilty is fundamental one for the defendant and not counsel (Jones v Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [1989]). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
” The WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones and CNN’s Bill Mears discuss the insights gleaned from former President George W. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:53 am by Brian Shiffrin
As the Court notedHaving accepted the assistance of counsel, a defendant retains authority over certain fundamental decisions (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751; People v Colon, 90 NY2d 824, 825; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478, cert denied 493 US 859). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:23 am by Kali Borkoski
Next week’s arguments in Snyder v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:13 am by Matthew Scarola
The WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones summarizes Barnes’s article, while First One @ One First’s Mike Sacks explores “the possible political motivations and jurisprudential consequences” of the idea. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:15 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Effective representation does not require briefing every conceivable issue, Jones v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
The WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones reports that the National Rifle Association is now officially opposing Kagan’s confirmation — but Jones doubts whether this will change many votes. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Anna Christensen
” PrawfsBlawg has a follow-up piece on the Court’s recent decision in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
 Ashby Jones at the WSJ Law Blog and Tony Mauro at the Blog of the Legal Times cover the cert. denial in Textron, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, Sullivan v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
 At the Washington Post, Michael Shear and Robert Barnes report on Kagan’s comments on Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:30 am by Georgetown Law Journal
Barnes, Erwin Chemerinsky, Trina Jones How Racial Profiling in America Became the Law of the Land: United States v. [read post]