Search for: "Jones v. Cabinet for Human Resources"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
In these circumstances, it was not a good use of the courts resources for the claim to be reinstated [65]. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:14 am
Society for Human Resource Management, 27 USPQ2d 1423 (TTAB 1993); and In re International Telephone & Telephone Corp., 197 USPQ 910, 911 (TTAB 1978). [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
” Jones’ article for the Guardian can be read here and a follow up article here. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Jones did not. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
Research and Resources Zipursky, Benjamin C., Presumed Damages and Reputational Injury (2023), Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 4687688. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm
Wall Street had one of its most volatile days in years yesterday, with the Dow Jones industrial average at one point plummeting by 460 points, or 2.8%. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
"Ø April 1, 2009 decision hereØ SCOTUS docket hereØ SCOTUSwiki hereØ Noted here: Jones Day; Mintz Levin; Ogletree DeakinsArgued - Awaiting Decision AT&T v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
The Petitioner drew attention to the fact that three of the remaining objectors are members of the PCC, but “unlike cabinet ministers, PCC members are not subject to the constraints of collective responsibility and are thus entitled to make representations to the representations of December 19th 2023 to the canopy [4]. [read post]
