Search for: "Jones v. City of Birmingham" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
, Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart LLP, Birmingham, Ala. 14 $124,546,733 Motor Vehicle Pacheco v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:39 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Tedjame- Mortty, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim B1 (05 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v First Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) [2011] EWCA Civ 400 (12 April 2011) Macpherson v Wise [2011] EWCA Civ 399 (12 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Administrative Court) Rahman, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 944 (Admin) (31 March 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
Irby and City of New York v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:43 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Appleby, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 926 (29 April 2010) Jones, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 925 (29 April 2010) Kazantzis, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 712 (16 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RW v SW [2010] EWCA Civ 457 (29 April 2010) Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) Parker v… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm by J
Birmingham City Council v Persons Unknown – 0BM70352 (noted by way of Arden Chambers Eflash) is a successful attempt by a local authority to distinguish the decision in Birmingham CC v Shafi [2008] EWCA Civ 1186; [2009] 1 WLR 1961; [2009] HLR 25 (our note here) and successfully obtain an injunction under s.222, Local Government Act 1972. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:30 am
The same view was expressed in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB).The requirement for a CFA to be signed by the client and the legal representative disappeared with the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
At the Court of Appeal, the issue was whether the previous court of appeal judgment in Smith v Evans [2007] EWCA Civ 1318 (actually Smith v Buckland, but continually cited here as Evans) could be considered as still standing after the decisions in Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57 (our post on Doherty here). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Johns, MI 48879-2423 Phone: (989) 224-0333 (V/TTY); (800) 274-7426 (Toll Free) E-mail: matr@edzone.net Web: http://www.cenmi.org/matr Michigan Telework Loan Fund C/O U.C.P. [read post]