Search for: "Jones v. Honeywell, Inc." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Oral Argument Preview: Liquidated Damages or Penalty in Public Construction Contract? Boone Coleman Construction Co., Inc. v. The Village of Piketon, Ohio.
3 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm by MBettman
(Jones v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Merit Decision: Court Upholds Liquidated Damages Provision in Public Works Construction Contract. Boone Coleman Constr., Inc. v. Piketon.
1 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by MBettman
”) Jones v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
What’s On Their Minds: Liquidated Damages or Penalty in Public Construction Contract? Boone Coleman Construction Co., Inc. v. Village of Piketon, Ohio.
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am by MBettman
(Jones v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
General Global Week in Review 30 November 2009 from IP Think Tank
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
Untitled
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am by Fred Goldsmith
Maddux claimed Maersk Line, Limited Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. are vicariously liable for his injuries pursuant to the Jones Act, the Public Vessels Act, the Suits in Admiralty Act and the general maritime law of the United States, or alternatively Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. [read post]
Goldsmith & Ogrodowski's Admiralty Update Blog - http://admiraltyupdate.blogspot.com/