Search for: "Jones v. King" Results 41 - 60 of 370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 6:40 am
"According to the article by Stephanie Mencimer in Mother Jones, and the flurry of Internet speculation that followed, it’s possible none of the four plaintiffs has been legally affected by having to buy insurance subject to the subsidies involved in the case. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
One half of your dynamic blogging duo -- Herrmann, of Jones Day -- will argue Ackermann in the Fifth Circuit, where the learned intermediary doctrine is the primary ground for affirming a trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of a drug manufacturer, but implied conflict preemption and fraud-on-the-FDA preemption (in the context of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code) are alternative grounds for affirmance.On Tuesday, December 4, Ted Olson of Gibson, Dunn &… [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
In Katz v Siroty, the defendant appealed an order denying his motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
She stoops to instruct: “Read the briefs,” Linda Greenhouse tells SCOTUS regarding high-profile King v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:39 am
Kevin Crosby, Newcastle Law School, has published R v Shipley (1784): The Dean of St Asaph's Case in Landmark Cases in Criminal Law (Philip Handler, Henry Mares, and Ian Williams, eds., Hart Publishing, 2017). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:39 am by Christine Corcos
Kevin Crosby, Newcastle Law School, has published R v Shipley (1784): The Dean of St Asaph's Case in Landmark Cases in Criminal Law (Philip Handler, Henry Mares, and Ian Williams, eds., Hart Publishing, 2017). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am by Amy Howe
  One of the most highly anticipated cases still outstanding is King v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  As the Court has shown us time and again in its immunity jurisprudence, the government can do no wrong, because the government -- like the King -- is sovereign. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones (1982): Fairness, Forty Years onPhilippa Collins (University of Bristol, UK)8. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
On appeal it was held:• Following Jones v Wrexham Borough Council [2007] EWCA Civ 1356, it was confirmed that the letter formed part of the second CFA. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:00 pm
”And it's in our best interests to end it right there.# # #Matter of Jones v Rodriguez (Decision & Order) [read post]