Search for: "Jones v. Knight" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
In today’s rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the composition of boards is not just a matter of compliance or social responsibility; it’s a strategic imperative that shapes the future of firms. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 1:22 pm by Gia Kokotakis
Tyler McBrien shared a motion submitted by Special Counsel Jack Smith for a protective order to limit the disclosure of discovery information in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Jones involves a question that is common in the class-action context: What happens when it’s not practical for the defendant to pay every member of the class? [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
[Content Updated 06/08/2022] Most police officers and the public think the thin blue line will stand faithfully between private citizens and evildoers as modern-day Knights Templars of sorts. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
The state has 33 petitions pending in criminal cases asking that McGirt be overruled — so many petitions they have two petitions just involving respondents named “Jones,” and another two with respondents named “Martin. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
Community Highlights and Recent News ● The Knight First Amendment Institute has published a blog, “City of Austin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 8:38 am by Russell Knight
Queen (1974), 56 Ill.2d 560, 564, 310 N.E.2d 166 “[W]hen an objection is made, specific grounds must be stated and other grounds not stated are waived on review” Jones v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 11:31 am by Gene Takagi
Summary of today’s Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 6:58 am by Russell Knight
The best evidence rule does not apply where a party seeks to prove a fact which has an existence independent of any writing, even though the fact might have been reduced to, or is evidenced by, a writing” Jones v. [read post]