Search for: "Jones v. Postal Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
(It was too crazy for Judge Jones, and that’s saying a lot). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Pix Credit: Michael A. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm
The department compared the suit to one against a Postal Service driver who crashed into someone’s car while delivering the mail. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:16 pm
Just as it would have been an error to see the early Internet as merely an extension of the existing postal service, it is important not to view the risks and opportunities of these new technologies solely through the lens of financial services. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am
Postal Service tracking document showing that “something was sent by certified mail to the Department of Administrative Services. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:17 am
Postal Service tracking document showing that “something was sent by certified mail to the Department of Administrative Services. [read post]
1 May 2020, 9:30 pm
Postal Service (they didn't include having it "be managed like a business"); and more. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:25 pm
US Postal Service, and others involving issues such as UPSTO inter partes review decisions and patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:41 am
Both the Supreme Court in the seminal Reno v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
United States Postal Service, 17-1594 Issues: (1) Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; and (2) whether an action under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:33 am
Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984) where an employee of a private delivery service cannot consent to the search of packages in transit. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:36 am
Postal Service tracking document showing that “something was sent by certified mail to the Department of Administrative Services. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:36 am
Postal Service tracking document showing that “something was sent by certified mail to the Department of Administrative Services. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Best, Connie Jones[.]Id. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
Jones, a 2012 case seemingly more favorable to defendants than Smith or Ex parte Jackson, where the Supreme Court distinguished between the protected contents and unprotected exterior of postal mail. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Jones, __ U.S. __,132 S.Ct. 945 (2012). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am
Jones, ––– U. [read post]
