Search for: "Jones v. Postal Service" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States Postal Service, 17-1594 Issues: (1) Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; and (2) whether an action under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The first took place in 2005, when Tosti gave his computer to a CompUSA store for servicing, and an employee found child pornography on it. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Postal Serv.Court: U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-1225 October 27, 2011 Judge: Lynch Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law The union that represents postal workers raised concerns that newly hired non-veteran employees had begun work earlier, and thus received higher seniority rankings, than veteran employees, despite the fact that the veteran employees had applied for their positions earlier than had the non-veterans. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm by Mark C. Niles
The department compared the suit to one against a Postal Service driver who crashed into someone’s car while delivering the mail. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:33 am by Marcia Shein
Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984) where an employee of a private delivery service cannot consent to the search of packages in transit. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
V FOR VENDETTA by Alan Moore and David Lloyd The book is probably one of the best graphic novels ever produced. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
Part 1 of this series examined proposals to fund media content via a tax on consumer electronics, broadband service, or cell phone bills.[1] Part 2 critiqued proposals to impose fees on broadcast spectrum licenses and channeling the proceeds to a “public square channel” or some other type of public media or “public interest” content.[2] Other essays in this series will address proposals to tax private advertising revenues to support public media; expand… [read post]