Search for: "Jones v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
In that era, the pri­mary responsibility for protecting seamen lay in the courts, which saw mariners as “peculiarly entitled to”—and particularly in need of—judicial protection “against the effects of the superior skill and shrewdness of masters and owners of ships. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:48 am by Francois Lesieur
The clearest statement to this effect was issued by the Ontario Superior Court in Somwar v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:24 pm by National Indian Law Library
Lad du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians (tribal jurisdiction)Jones v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am by Susan Brenner
Burgos, __ A.3d __, 2013 WL 618794 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2013). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Toronto E&L Group
In determining whether or not to recognize the tort of harassment, the Court of Appeal looked to Bhasin v Hrynew, which affirmed the duty of good faith contractual performance in 2014, and Jones v Tsige, which recognized the tort of “intrusion upon seclusion” in 2012. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:56 am by Karin Johnson
In a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court (one of Pennsylvania’s two state appellate courts) recently issued a ruling in Socko v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 1353, 1358, 1369–1370 or Jones v. [read post]