Search for: "Jones v. Superior Court" Results 101 - 120 of 532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2020, 7:33 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
To court provided this explanation on this recent motion, in Karasik v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
  Footnote 2 of the opinion says:  "Although the rationale is unclear to this court, Proposition 64 differentiates cannabis, which must be in an unopened, sealed, container, from 'loose cannabis flower,' which only needs to be in a closed container. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
In its latest application of the Dead Man’s Rule, the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Jones v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:23 am by privacylawyer
Regular readers of this (irregular) blog will recall the milestone case of Jones v Tsige, in which the Ontario Court of Appeal imported into Canada the US privacy torts. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:23 am by privacylawyer
Regular readers of this (irregular) blog will recall the milestone case of Jones v Tsige, in which the Ontario Court of Appeal imported into Canada the US privacy torts. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:37 am by Kraft Davies, PLLC
At the time of the incident, our law firm was involved in pending litigation in King County Superior Court against the vessel for alleged unsafe crab pot stacking practices that led to a career-ending crew injury. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
After being convicted in district court, the defendant appealed for trial de novo in superior court, and the jury found him guilty of the lesser charge of simple assault. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada It is reported that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has dismissed a CA$210 million defamation claim filed by Subway against the CBC, which had reported the sandwich chain may have been selling some poultry products that were only 50 percent chicken DNA. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Jamie Markham
Jones, 358 N.C. 473 (2004), that when faced with inconsistent opinions from separate panels, a subsequent panel of the court of appeals must follow the earlier opinion. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
In that era, the pri­mary responsibility for protecting seamen lay in the courts, which saw mariners as “peculiarly entitled to”—and particularly in need of—judicial protection “against the effects of the superior skill and shrewdness of masters and owners of ships. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The district court denied the MAR, and the superior court denied defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the denial. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 13 conference)   Superior Communications Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:15 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Judge Ann I Jones Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles Central Civil West Los Angeles, CA Dear Judge Jones: You will shortly be asked to approve a settlement in Lavinsky v. [read post]