Search for: "Jones v. Superior Court" Results 141 - 160 of 532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Thomas Surmanski
It is pretty clear that [Jordan] means the date of decision” (para. 16). 2018 Trial Court Decisions: CharleyIn late June, 2018, the Ontario Superior Court turned its mind to this question in the case of R. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Thomas Surmanski
It is pretty clear that [Jordan] means the date of decision” (para. 16). 2018 Trial Court Decisions: CharleyIn late June, 2018, the Ontario Superior Court turned its mind to this question in the case of R. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand Sir Bob Jones has filed a defamation lawsuit against a filmmaker, Renae Maihi, following Maihi accusing Jones of hate speech. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm by Joy Waltemath
But the court allowed the officers’ retaliation claim to proceed, finding they alleged their supervisors became hostile and lowered their performance evaluations after they complained of sexual orientation-based harassment (Jones v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 21 to 23 May 2018 Warby J heard an application for permission to serve a representative action out of the jurisdiction in the case of Lloyd v Google. [read post]
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
A federal court in Louisiana recently addressed the legal consequences of mixing work and pleasure in a case in which a company’s HR manager alleges she felt obligated to have sex with one of her superiors. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Supreme Court has now heard oral arguments in two gerrymandering cases this term, and the world wonders whether Justice Anthony Kennedy will at last carry through on his suggestion in 2004’s Vieth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:38 pm by Daniel Nazer
This test, from a California Supreme Court case called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]