Search for: "Jones v. Wise" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2011, 9:42 pm by Ogletree Abbott
” The Jones Act attorney had brought a successful lawsuit, under the Jones Act, for injuries to Henry Welk when he was a crew member on board the F/V DAWN. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:39 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Tedjame- Mortty, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim B1 (05 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v First Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber) [2011] EWCA Civ 400 (12 April 2011) Macpherson v Wise [2011] EWCA Civ 399 (12 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Administrative Court) Rahman, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 944 (Admin) (31 March 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:12 pm by Claire
Wise, 550 F.2d 1180, over more recent opinions such as MAI Systems Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
   Such is ICLB's Oxford correspondent, with the latest dispatch from the courtroom -- a default judgment was entered against the defendants as a sanction for improper conduct in the Jones v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:10 pm by The White Law Group
”According to FINRA, this matter reportedly originated from an Investor Complaint Form submitted to FINRA referencing Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:11 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Thursday, January 19, 2012: Cruise Lines Use Law and Contracts to Limit Liability Pentagon: Thousands of sex assaults unreported Tort of Invasion of Privacy in Ontario Christie Blatchford: Shafia trial testimony ends with an abrupt whimper - National Post Facebook Stalking in Family Law...Again  Porn industry could pull out of L.A. if condoms required Keep Your Pants On - The Morals Clause in Performer Contracts… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:56 pm
No, it’s not a bad joke – the hot off the press judgment (from 9th November 2011) from the Supreme Court in the case of Kernott v Jones means that the answer may be, umm, we’re not sure... [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm by Malik Cutlar
Chief Judge Jones noted that in light of this new standard, the Fourth Circuit in The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
The most interesting part of the dissent is CJ Effron's suggestion, citing Jones v. [read post]