Search for: "Joos v. Joos"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
Local JOO AFL-CIO v Schwartz, 32 AD3d 710, 713 [1st Dept 2006] (internal quotations omitted).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
Local JOO AFL-CIO v Schwartz, 32 AD3d 710, 713 [1st Dept 2006] (internal quotations omitted).) [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:48 am
The court or tribunal will have to determine what the defendant knew (the subjective element) and to determine whether his actions to register the mark with such knowledge would be regarded as being in bad faith by persons adopting proper standards (the objective element) (Valentino Globe v Pacific Rim Industries [2010] 2 SLR 1203, Wing Joo Loong Ginseng Hong (Singapore) Co Pte Ltd v Qinghai Xinyuan Foreign Trade Co Ltd [2009] 2 SLR (R) 814). [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 12:24 am
Koh's upcoming ruling following the FTC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 12:10 am
Readers may remember Case C-283/01 Shield Mark NV v Joos Kist, trading as Memex, in which it was not Rembrandt who provided the cultural content but Ludwig van Beethoven.Merpel has some bad news for Bas and his colleagues, though: she has spotted some killer prior art, below: [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
” Corporations, the Constitution, and the Rights of Others by Thomas Joo in the CLS Blue Sky Blog Unfortunately, denying corporate constitutional rights is unlikely to have much effect. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 am
In Elrom v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
This is also typically where courts will consider whether the copying is de minimis — too trifling for the law to be concerned with.2 That is what the Middle District Court of Tennessee did in Bridgeport Music v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
Cariou v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am
In addition, Thomas Joo has argued that more permissive rules toward “remix” also reinforce dominant culture, contrary to what proponents of such rules (including Lessig) have claimed. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
In Irish law, children’s interests are currently protected by constitutional rights to welfare under Article 42 and Article 40.3 (identified in cases such as G v An Bord Uchtála and Nicolaou v An Bord Uchtála) and the requirement under section 3 of the Guardianship of Infants Act, that the court must make the child’s welfare the first and paramount concern in cases involving the child’s upbringing. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Written while Eldred v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Joo on Grand Upright: Copyright scholars are in general agreement that a 1991 opinion, Grand Upright Music v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:41 am
To reserve rooms, contact Christine Joo at (305) 377-9400 or c.joo@hospitalityamerica.com; tell her you are with this conference. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:13 pm
Louis University Law Review (forthcoming 2012) (symposium on teaching election law) (draft available) The Supreme Court’s Shrinking Election Law Docket: A Legacy of Bush v. [read post]
