Search for: "Joost v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2022, 7:29 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The Czech Republic Monika Zalnieriute, Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
 Wells was up to Fort Meade, covering this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
Case date: 30 November 2021 Case number: No. 20-1933 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
If these representations contradict arguments made during prosecution of a patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), they may serve as the basis for an inequitable conduct finding. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
From In Custodia Legis (the blog of the Law Librarians of Congress): "Witchcraft and a Haunted Case of Torture in Joost de Damhouder’s Praxis Rerum Criminalium (1555)"; How a House Becomes Legally Haunted: Stambovsky v. [read post]
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the  rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 5:00 pm by Simon Lester
Developing countries seeking access to the economic prosperity promised by international trade long argued that joining the WTO meant they had to follow rules that the United States and European countries could flaunt. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
The defamation case of Jooste v GMC was heard on 26 June 2012 and an ex tempore judgment given. [read post]