Search for: "Jordan v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Amar's research assistants at Yale Law School (Arshan Barzani, Samarth Desai, Jacob Hutt, and Jordan Kei-Rahn), which I am glad to do; all that follows below is their work: [* * *] We are research assistants to Professor Akhil Reed Amar at Yale Law School. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
IPSO 14049-23 Kausar v manchestereveningnews.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 14050-23 Kausar v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19593-23 Jordan-Gill v bournemouthecho.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 20255-23 White v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Statements in Open Court and… [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Johnson J reached the same decision as Heather Williams J ([2023] EWHC 232 (KB) [pdf]). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), Trump, and others discussed taking to social media to encourage Trump supporters to march to the Capitol on Jan. 6. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
Held, the only defamatory element of the article was that Mr Ismaik was convicted in Jordan in financial cases involving petty sums of money; and that he was prosecuted in a major money laundering case. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
Most recently, in the May 2019 Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal, the ICC’s Appeals Chamber considered Jordan’s failure to arrest then Sudanese President Al-Bashir (against whom warrants had been issued for crimes under international law), when he traveled to the territory of Jordan. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]