Search for: "Jordan v. State of Indiana" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Claiming Eleventh Amendment immunityBurrus v State Lottery Commission of Indiana, USCA 7th Circuit, Docket #08-1142In Edelman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Indiana Dept. of Corrections, an 8-page opinion, Judge Robb writes:Roy Smith, pro se, appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his complaint against the Indiana Department of Correction ("DOC"), the Indiana State Prison ("ISP"), the State of Indiana, and several employees of ISP, after conducting the inquiry required by Indiana Code chapter 34-58-1. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am by Matthew Lanahan
At this blog, Jordan Steiker discusses the opinion in McQuiggin v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the justices ruled unanimously “that the constitution protects people accused of crimes from having outlandish sums seized by city or state authorities. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 11:48 am
Eaton, will be David Jordan of Lafuze, Jordan & Cox in Richmond; Deputy Attorney General Scott Barnhart will argue for the State of Indiana. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 11:48 am
Eaton, will be David Jordan of Lafuze, Jordan & Cox in Richmond; Deputy Attorney General Scott Barnhart will argue for the State of Indiana. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
Eaton, will be David Jordan of Lafuze, Jordan & Cox in Richmond; Deputy Attorney General Scott Barnhart will argue for the State of Indiana. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
State, 2017 WL 242609 (Court of Appeals of Indiana 2017). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Jordan, and Troutwine Estates Development Co., LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 Among these states, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin expressly allow recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to statute. [read post]