Search for: "Jordan v. USA"
Results 61 - 80
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
At Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, Jordan Rubin “explains the Supreme Court case where a defense attorney goes rogue, doing what he thinks best over his client’s express objection,” death-penalty case McCoy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Jason Jordan, University of North Texas: De Jure Blackness: Racialization in Brown v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am
Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin discuss Sveen at Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
The first is Herrera v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
’” Briefly: At Bloomberg BNA, Jordan Rubin looks at four amicus briefs filed in support of the government in Carpenter v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:53 am
” Jordan Smith takes a close look at the case at The Intercept. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
| 9th Circuit ‘slam-dunks’ claim of copyright infringement by Nike photograph of Michael Jordan and ‘Jumpman’ logo | Gutenberg.org loses to German publisher and is found liable for damages | AIPPI UK Event Report: Registration, notice and infringement - is certainty an illusion? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
As a teenager in 1992 who bought EA Sports' Team USA Basketball for the Sega Genesis just to play as the Dream Team, I may just have to pick up a copy of NBA2K13 for my XBox 360.Members of the Dream Team will of course be compensated by 2K Sports for the use of their name and likeness. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Leis Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0425p.06 Jordan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Blume and Jordan M. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 7:32 am
” And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Josh Blackman has a post titled “SCOTUS Decides South Bay v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:52 pm
Valeska V. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
Kelsey Clinton analyzed oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
” At The Atlantic, Eric Posner weighs in on Monday’s decision in Apple v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Kelsey Clinton analyzed oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Question is not “are the US in breach”, the question is “how are the USA going to react if UK says breach? [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:09 am
In the recent case of Stancil v. [read post]
