Search for: "Jordan v. Wright et al"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 12:33 pm
” 19 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 4511 (2d ed. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
§ 6021 et seq. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Spicy IP) Both Hindi cinema and theatre are accused of copyright infringement by relatives of dead authors (Spicy IP) Dispute between Bisleri and Coca-Cola over ‘Maaza’ trade mark ends up in Delhi High Court (Spicy IP) Geographical indications: the BASMATI wrangle (International Law Office) Foreign geographical indications enter India: (Spicy IP) Trade mark search essential to reveal deceptively similar trade marks (International Law Office) Outsourcing patent related services… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
The shoes were filled with holy water sourced from the Jordan River and adorned with religious symbols, including a miniature crucifix and the inscription “MT. 14:25,” referencing the biblical passage describing Jesus walking on water.[20] Despite not being endorsed or made by Nike, the Jesus Shoes gained popularity and were worn by celebrities like Drake. [read post]
