Search for: "Jose A. Cabranes"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
Judge Jose A. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
Of the panel’s judges — Jose A. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
The 52-page opinion, by Judge Jon Newman for himself, Jose Cabranes, and Rosemary Pooler, opens: This appeal of a judgment dismissing challenges to denials of requests under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) presents important issues arising at the intersection of the public’s opportunity to obtain information about their government’s activities and the legitimate interests of the Executive Branch in maintaining secrecy about… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:50 am
Not, though, before one of the towering figures on the Second Circuit, Jose Cabranes, fired off to Judge Rufe a now widely circulated email. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
In the most important part of the ruling, written by Circuit Judge Jose A. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Judge Jose Cabranes was quite explicit about this when he pushed a 2-year degree in 2012. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:28 pm
Winter, Jose A. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:40 pm
Jose A. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm
Writing for two members of the panel, Judge Jose Cabranes held that (in my very quick and dirty summary):1) International Law governs the scope of liability for violations of international law, hence the question of whether a corporation is liable for violating international law is itself governed by international law.2) Under Supreme Court precedent, the Alien Tort Statute requires courts to apply norms of international law, and not domestic law, to the scope of… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Although that decision was unanimous, there was a fundamental disagreement between Judge Jose Cabranes, who wrote the opinion for the court, and Judge Pierre Leval, who wrote a separate concurring opinion. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
Writing the judgement, Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes stated that: "We see no reason why a single-color mark in the specific context of the fashion industry could not acquire secondary meaning? [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Although that decision was unanimous, there was a fundamental disagreement between Judge Jose Cabranes, who wrote the opinion for the court, and Judge Pierre Leval, who wrote a separate concurring opinion. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
It reminds me of the comment of Judge Jose Cabranes, who said of trustees at the universities where he has served on the board, “No one will be surprised to learn that business executives (who make up a large part of all university boards), for example, prefer to be the sort of trustees that they would hope to have on their own boards—namely, they prefer ‘team players’ who do not disturb the peace of the executive, who recognize the limits of their… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:15 am
In a June 27, 2013 opinion (here), the Second Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Jose A. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am
The Second Circuit panel in Kiobel, led by Judge Jose Cabranes, raised the corporate liability sua sponte. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:40 am
In a June 27, 2013 opinion (here), the Second Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Jose A. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:35 am
What if Judge Jose Cabranes and other judges on the Second Circuit were moved by Ricci's plight and the deep unfairness of what New Haven had done and argued for rehearing the case on the grounds that the current interpretation of the law is wrong and should be altered? [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
The plaintiff is "asking the court to recognize a cause of action that Congress did not create," Cohn said, an argument that seemed to get a sympathetic hearing from Judges Dennis Jacobs and Jose Cabranes. [read post]
4 May 2009, 6:34 am
" He also says that dissenting judge Jose Cabranes criticized the majority for not addressing the constitutional issues raised by the plaintiffs. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:59 pm
But writing for a two-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit, Judge Jose Cabranes concluded that "a reasonable jury could find that YouTube had actual knowledge or awareness of specific infringing activity on its website. [read post]
