Search for: "Jose v. Jose"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
Judge James Ware has had a notable career as a lawyer and judge here in the San Jose and greater San Francisco Bay Area. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:52 pm
See People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:54 pm
But it's been the law forever, and Congress has elected not to change it notwithstanding its high-profile nature.So if the San Francisco Giants want to squash competition by conspiring with other major league baseball owners to deny the Oakland A's permission to move to San Jose -- which is in the Giants' "territory" -- that's okay. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:33 pm
See Roper v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
Motorola Credit Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:12 am
Only Congress and the Supreme Court are empowered to question Flood's continued vitality, and with it, the fate of baseball's singular and historic exemption from the antitrust lawsIn early news coverage, Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has an update headlined "San Jose v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:45 am
See Keeler v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
The Supreme Court said so in Furman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:35 am
City of San Jose (Case No. [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:12 pm
About two weeks ago the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office announced that hundreds of DUI cases were being reviewed because of a faulty breath-test machine, the Alco-Sensor V. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:07 pm
In fact, in his motion, Padilla relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:28 pm
By: Erica Shelley Nelson and Sarah Burke In Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
San Jose, January 24, 2012). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
Last week petitioner Jose Padilla filed his brief on the merits in No. 08-651, Padilla v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:34 pm
Surrogacy law in California is governed by 2 Supreme Court cases: Johnson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 12:42 pm
Information about proceeding in San Jose [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 12:42 pm
Information about proceeding in San Jose [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:53 pm
City of San Jose, et al. v. [read post]
