Search for: "Jose v. Jose"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 8:30 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court upheld an inclusionary housing ordinance adopted by the City of San Jose in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 8:11 am
UC Davis law student Janet Kim prepared this preview of Padilla v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:58 pm
(See People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:30 pm
(See People v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 3:02 pm
City of San Jose case, in which the court held that San Jose's inclusionary zoning ordinance was a valid exercise of police... [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 1:20 pm
Stephen Miller and I have previously blogged about California Building Industry Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 6:15 pm
" Please see County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:20 am
Criminal Procedure Successive appeals Jose M. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
Supreme Court to hear Apple v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:06 am
I share Jonathan Adler's and Judge Jose Cabranes' view that the Second Circuit should have given en banc consideration to the important issues raised in Ricci v. [read post]
Recent Hague Convention District Court Cases - Junior v De Sousa. 2023 WL 4725909 (N.D. Ohio, 2023).
6 Aug 2023, 2:04 pm
[Brazil][Petition granted][Motion for reconsideration and stay pending appeal denied] Junior v De Sousa. 2023 WL 4725909 (N.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
City of San Jose (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 689, 704; 14 Cal. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:32 am
Barbara Lauriat, King's College London, is publishing Walter v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:36 pm
Amaral-Estrada, Jose A. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Oral Argument in case# 10-3110; USA v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:51 pm
Oral Argument in case: 06-3979; Barraza-Ibarra, Jose v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
Oral Argument in case# 10-1988; USA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:57 am
Oral Argument in case# 12-2045; Jose Matamoros v. [read post]