Search for: "Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 141 - 160
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2021, 10:25 pm
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote about that choice here). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 11:13 am
Earlier this year, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote an essay for the Illinois Law Review on President Biden's first 100 days. [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
Maryland could help decide the Faithless Electors Cases] [This post was co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, we posed three questions concerning the characterization of presidential electors. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
"] In May, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed on Lawfare whether the President was an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of the federal officer removal statute. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a lengthy post on this case in July 2019. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote in early 2020 that even if Trump were convicted of violating this statute, he could not be disqualified from serving a second term as President. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
I responded to this argument in three posts (1, 2, and 3), the first co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:36 am
(You can see all the briefs that Seth Barrett Tillman and I filed here.) [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:44 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I had similar concerns after oral arguments. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:28 pm
And Justice Barrett clerked for Justice Scalia in OT 1998. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
See Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part II: The Four Approaches, 61 South Texas Law Review 321, 421 (2022) (concluding that the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore are "Officers" for purposes of the Succession Clause, and can succeed to the presidency.) [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
” Tillman filed an amicus brief in support of Trump with Professor Josh Blackman of South Texas College of Law Houston. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm
In November 2019, Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained our disagreement with the Amars in The Atlantic. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:35 am
Presumably, some of the signatories agree with me and my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman that the First Amendment does apply–or at least has some relevance–to impeachment proceedings. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:41 pm
During President Trump's second impeachment trial, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote that elected officials, including the President, retained their First Amendment right to freedom of speech. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman During most impeachment trials, the Vice President presides over the Senate. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On Thursday, February 15, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization titled "The Enforcement Act of 1870: Disqualification Myths and Realities. [read post]
