Search for: "Josh Chafetz"
Results 101 - 120
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
To be sure, as Josh Chafetz helpfully points out, congressional capacity has declined precipitously in recent decades. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 10:49 am
Josh Chafetz will be on hand to heartily disagree. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:29 am
To discuss these and many other issues, we have invited an exciting group of constitutional scholars: Josh Chafetz Joseph R. [read post]
“He Cares about People”: Sotomayor Praises Thomas As Professors and Pundits Pile on Personal Attacks
21 Oct 2022, 7:37 am
As protesters descended on the homes of justices, Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz declared that “when the mob is right, some (but not all!) [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:13 am
Recently, I criticized fellow Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz who supported more “aggressive” protests targeting justices “when the mob is right. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
Ali, University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Regimes Alec Stone Sweet, Yale Law School and Yale Political Science Law & Humanities e-Journal Legal Holes Noa Ben-Asher, Pace University - School of Law The Radicalism of Legal Positivism Brian Leiter, University of Chicago Law School Democracy and Antigone Ruthann Robson, City University of New York - CUNY School of Law Impeachment and Assassination Josh Chafetz,… [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 8:48 am
” For more on the relevance of the Speech and Debate Clause to Congress’s power in interbranch conflicts, I recommend Josh Chafetz, Congress’s Constitution (pp. 742-761). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The court acknowledged that it has in fact resolved such disputes, including one involving a Senate subpoena to President Nixon during Watergate, but then, quoting my colleague Josh Chafetz, decided to disregard those precedents on the ground that “courts have never offered a persuasive reason why a congressional subpoena to an executive branch official” gives rise to a proper case.That is a truly stunning move. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
” Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz and others are interested in taking a more active approach to making continuation on the Court as unpleasant as possible — at least for conservatives. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:24 am
Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz declared that “when the mob is right, some (but not all!) [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
Is the desire to be even stricter simply another sign of the pathological way we treat our presidents as father figures and our strange incorporation of Josh Chafetz's insight that since impeachment=tyrannicide, and therefore paracide, it should become almost literally unthinkable? [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
The implicit reason, of course, is that it would be the equivalent of parricide (and not simply, as Josh Chafetz suggested some years ago in an excellent article, a useful substitute for tyrannicide). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:17 pm
And so, while it’s easy to write off Trump’s tweet, it’s worth considering Cornell Law professor Josh Chafetz’s suggestion that statement should be read as “part of an ongoing effort to shift the constitutional debate around president-checking mechanisms. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:17 am
As Professor Josh Chafetz has observed, running to the courts for enforcement assistance is in some sense an admission of weakness; this observation is even more apt in the context of a dispute with the House’s own members than of one with outside witnesses. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz declared that “when the mob is right, some (but not all!) [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 9:40 am
Hasen (UC Irvine), Josh Chafetz, (Cornell Law School), Henry Olsen (Ethics & Public Policy Center & Washington Post), Matthew Glassman (Senior Fellow, Government Affairs Institute, Georgetown University), and David Karol (Panel Chair, University of Maryland, College Park). [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
For a spirited defense of this approach, see this nice piece by Akhil Amar and my colleague Josh Chafetz.4) Finally, if all else fails, there's what we might call the Andrew Jackson approach--named for the President who, so the probably-false legend goes, said in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 12:56 am
At Cornell's Constitutional Law & Theory Colloquium (which I run with my colleague Josh Chafetz), Gerhardt discussed the overview chapter and the chapter on William Henry Harrison. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:53 pm
Josh Chafetz (Cornell) has argued the same, and I'm sure others have as well.) [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:11 am
What I do believe is that the Senate may have more options in this case than one might think.UPDATE: Akhil Amar and Josh Chafetz over at Slate reach conclusions similar to mine by a different route: They point out (as does Mark Tushnet) that the Senate is also the judge of the "return" which, in this case, means the report of an appointment. [read post]
