Search for: "Joshua Rozenberg"
Results 21 - 40
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
As Joshua Rozenberg explained in a post at the time, the Government will stop funding BAILII. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
There is also a Factsheet: the Attorney General’s Referral of a Protest Case to the Court of Appeal, and Joshua Rozenberg explains the law here. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
An alternative possibility is that it might seek to repeal s 8 of the 1900 Act, but, as Joshua Rozenberg points out, “that could be tricky and might require hybrid legislation. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 10:30 am
“The unconstitutional committee; Top judges, cross-examined on Miller 2 ruling, cry foul”: At his “A Lawyer Writes” Substack site, Joshua Rozenberg has a post that begins, “Lord Reed’s appearance before the House of Lords constitution committee this morning led to an unexpected clash — and one that was deeply unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 8:04 am
” Joshua Rozenberg has this post at his “A Lawyer Writes” Substack site. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 7:34 am
” Joshua Rozenberg has this post at his “A Lawyer Writes” Substack site. [read post]
5 May 2021, 10:54 am
-based Joshua Rozenberg, who publishes the newsletter A Lawyer Writes, where he covers and comments on developments in the law. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm
Crook also omits to consider an important point about the independence of the judiciary, to which Joshua Rozenberg has recently alluded with regard to increased digitisation of court proceedings: is it right for the Government to wholly host court services, including provision of documents? [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Joshua Rozenberg interviewed Lord Justice McFarlane on adoption for BBC Radio 4 Law in Action (following the recent inaugural Bridget Lindley memorial lecture) Fascinating interview by @JoshuaRozenberg with McFarlane LJ on #adoption: https://t.co/bw5rSdumIK; see further eg https://t.co/hRyHqWs22q. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm
The purpose of this update is to correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family court cases, to explain and comment on published Judgments of family cases and to highlight other transparency news. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The following article by Joshua Rozenberg originally appeared on fullfact.org and can be found here. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:04 pm
Joshua Rozenberg had a piece in the Guardian, “The celebrity threesome case risks undermining the law“, making the surprising suggestion that the lone dissenter, Lord Toulson, was more convincing than his four colleagues. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:46 am
Undermining human rights bodies: reactions to the opinion of the Working Group on Assange It is not the purpose of this commentary to assess the content of the opinion of the Working Group, largely criticised for its shaky legal foundations elsewhere (see for instance: Mathew Happold here, Joshua Rozenberg here, or a more nuanced view by Liora Lazarus here). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 6:27 am
As reported by The Washington Post: "Joshua Rozenberg, a British legal commentator, wrote that the dissent is "so self-evidently true that it seems hard to believe the majority could have been persuaded otherwise. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:28 am
In addition, the list of honorary silks includes the noted legal journalist, Joshua Rozenberg – the author of Privacy and the Press (OUP, 2004) Inforrm would like to congratulate the new appointees to silk. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:00 pm
At the Guardian, Joshua Rozenberg agrees. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:48 am
"It goes back centuries here," explains London-based legal writer Joshua Rozenberg. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
This summer, some of the editors of the UKSC Blog were invited to the UKSC to meet and interview Lord Neuberger. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Being professional for a moment, I should also mention Law in Action, with Joshua Rozenberg – a range of great titles like Bringing Bankers to Book, legal issues behind the Wikileaks story, and Are Drones Legal. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
The Court (its Chief Executive, Jenny Rowe, in the chair for this purpose) gave the prized first question to Joshua Rozenberg who asked for a reaction to Conservative policy on repeal of the Human Rights Act, with a techy follow up on what the Court would do if the Act were repealed: develop a common law equivalent of the s.3 obligation (my gloss on Rozenberg’s question)? [read post]
