Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Judge Currie and the Commission agree that his conduct not only violated the law but also violated the high standards of conduct expected of Indiana's judges. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 12:24 pm
” Turning to the legal standard, Parrella noted that, in his view, “the only ‘judicial act’ forming a possible basis for a[n unlawful influence] claim in this case is discussion of potential PTAs. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:58 pm
In a strong statement of judicial deference to the expertise of an administrative agency, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that the six-year statute of limitations in the British Columbia Securities Act was triggered by the settlement of an Ontario Securities Commission enforcement action and not by the misconduct underlying the action. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:35 am
Five groups of petitioners are seeking emergency relief to stay the Commission's final rules on the enhancement and standardization of climate-related disclosures. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
The rules governing judicial conduct require judges to be an "exemplar of dignity and decorum and to preside over disputes in a lawful, orderly manner. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:40 pm
Circuit’s notoriously strict standard. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 8:13 pm
Each has an independent public sphere and should be adjudged according to its own norms and standards. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Before August 23, 2013, the Judicial Standards Commission, rather than the state supreme court, was authorized to issue public reprimands as well as private letters of caution. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:52 am
The ITC has a different standard which allows companies to avoid a judicial test and forego monetary relief. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:52 am
According to the story, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judges Marsha Revel and Elden Fox were reprimanded by the California Commission on Judicial Performance ("CCJP"). [read post]
Florida Amendment 5 & New Hampshire CACR 26: Giving legislatures more power over judicial rulemaking
30 Aug 2012, 8:47 am
Most state constitutions explicitly grant their state courts of last resort the power to establish rules of practice, procedure, and/or administration for the state’s judiciary, including judiciary-related organs such as administrative offices of the courts, judicial disciplinary commissions, etc. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:28 am
“It is essential that judicial processes respect international standards in determining the responsibilities of the perpetrators and masterminds of serious violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:31 am
The Electoral Commission, an independent body which sets standards for the running of elections, has released its report on problems experienced by voters during the 2010 General Election. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:24 am
The text of the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct, promulgated by the Chief Administrator of the Courts with the approval of the Court of Appeals is annexed. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
DO JUDICIAL CHALLENGES TO TAKINGS STILL EXIST? [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
Roger Williams of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission, "Judicial Roles. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:08 am
In its Order Issuing Stay, the Commission did expressly state, that it “will continue vigorously defending the Final Rule. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
Walter Crayton, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court established a new standard for the admission at trial of an in-court identification of the defendant where the witness had not, prior to trial, been asked to participate in an out of court identification procedure. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:41 am
This is when a board or commission applies the law to a set of specific facts. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:03 pm
On April 8, 2016, the Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin, issued an important decision interpreting the standard of review that applies to the judicial review of certain administrative enforcement orders issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). [read post]
